Our objective tool scored today’s intake as Medium, but he has a fresh jail assault (last 10 days), a 2019 work‑detail walk‑off, and an active separation tied to someone already in our population. Do you bump to Close on an administrative override now, or hold Medium with targeted housing controls and a 14‑day reassessment?
I’d override to Close now based on the “fresh jail assault (last 10 days)” plus the active separation, then set a 7‑day review so you’re not stuck there if intel clears. In my shop we park them on a keep‑separate tier with restricted movement and require a 72‑hour separation verification before any step‑down. If bed pressure makes that tough, you could hold Medium with the same controls for 72 hours — do you have a slot that can honor the separation?
But with the “fresh jail assault” and active separation, I’m leaning Close via an admin override like @efrank_91, but make it belt-and-suspenders: hard keep-away in OMS/pod board and a 72‑hour intel check before the 7‑day review, with step‑down criteria documented in the override note… If you’re still on a blotter entry, pull the full incident report and separation details before that 72‑hour check.
Even though the tool scored Medium, with an in‑custody assault inside 10 days and a live separation, I’d bump to Close and immediately code a two‑way keep‑separate plus unit lockout in OMS so movement can’t misplace him. If intel confirms that separation is stale by mid‑week, roll him back and note the override rationale — agree, @efrank_91?
Make it Close on an override, but log the reason codes so the audit trail reflects the “fresh jail assault” plus the live separation, and put a two‑way keep‑separate in OMS immediately… The 2019 walk‑off is stale; I’d restrict jobs/outcounts for now and set the committee to recheck classification mid‑week. If Close beds are jammed, use intake‑hold Medium with single‑cell and no movement until the review.